Address the Cost of Health Care
Here is a letter to the editor I sent to the York Daily Record on health care reform:
I am responding to a May 4 op-ed by Rep. Eugene DePasquale, in which he defends PA ABC, a proposed expansion of taxpayer-subsidized, government-controlled health insurance. While Mr. DePasquale's intentions are honorable, his justification is not sound.Here is another take on RendellCare by Gary Hornberger.
He cites an estimate that uncompensated care for the uninsured costs Pennsylvania providers $1.4 billion—costs which are passed on in higher insurance rates. But Rep. DePasquale fails to mention that his proposal would cost about $1 billion annually, to only cover one-fourth of the currently uninsured. He also fails to note studies showing that persons on government insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and programs like PA ABC) are more likely to use emergency rooms than the uninsured, and government payments to providers are less than what the uninsured/cash payers pay. In other words, government health care programs are driving up the rates of private insurance.
Instead of PA ABC, lawmakers should focus on reforms that will reduce the costs of health care and coverage, both for the uninsured and for the 11 million Pennsylvanians that have coverage.
1 comment:
If you compare 16% of GDP going to health care in USA to +-10% in the developed world (and your still rising!), it's really strange. I don't think your economy is ready to deal with such enormous expenses for a long time. If I can compare USA and Canada (since I am dealing health insurance and disability insurance in Canada), our public/private expenses ratio is about 70:30 percents, while your is 45:55. It's not such a big difference! I am really not sure, what additional government expenses will do with that system...
Lorn
Post a Comment