Is Rendell's rebate legal?
John Micek in the Morning Call raises some key issues as to Governor Rendell's proposed "rebate" for low-income Pennsylvanians.
First, that the using the Budget Stabilization Reserve (or "Rainy Day") Fund requires a two third vote, and tapping it for new programs is inconsistent with the law creating the Rainy Day Fund - Act 91 of 2002:
"Money in the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund shall not be used to begin new programs but to provide for the continuation of vital public programs in danger of being eliminated or severely reduced due to financial problems resulting from the economy."Budget Secretary Michael Masch reponds by noting laws don't matter to the Rendell administration when spending money is at stake
''If the General Assembly agrees, they have the power to make the withdrawal,Second, Micek raises the question of whether the rebate would be taxable at the federal level. My read on this is that the $400 rebate would be considered taxable income, but anyone receiving it would still have no tax liability after standard deductions, personal exemptions, and child tax credit. (Tax Calculator)
notwithstanding any language with respect to intent that may have appeared in a
prior statute,'' Masch said.
However, recipients could lose a portion of what they may from the refundable federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC Calculator).
1 comment:
Imagine a Pennsylvania Politician doing something illegal? This has become par for the course, both here in the Commonwealth and on a National level. There seems to be a continued effort of our elected officials to disregard the charge that has been set forth for them when we send them to govern. If I must remind them is to protect our rights by upholding the Constitution. What a fresh and novel idea.
Post a Comment