PolicyBlog has moved!

Thank you for visiting, PolicyBlog has a new address.

Our new location is http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/policyblog

Please adjust your bookmarks. Archived posts will remain here for now.


Monday, January 21, 2008

Reagan's Economy

Spokesman for the Clinton campaign, one-time economist, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman attempts to denounce Barack Obama for even mentioning Ronald Reagan without espousing anger and hatred towards "history's greatest monster". Krugman's complaint:

The Reagan economy was a one-hit wonder. Yes, there was a boom in the mid-1980s, as the economy recovered from a severe recession. But while the rich got much richer, there was little sustained economic improvement for most Americans. By the late 1980s, middle-class incomes were barely higher than they had been a decade before — and the poverty rate had actually risen.

Since I have access to the internet, I thought I would take five minutes to check Krugman's facts, which are all misleading (I can't call them false, because it is unclear what he is measuring. Some point in the late 1980's to some point a decade earlier? Is he comparing the Reagan economy to what it was before stagflation under Jimmy Carter? )

Under Reagan (1981-1989)
Any basic look at the economy will tell you that we had recession/slow growth from 1978-83, growth from 1983-90, recession in 91-92, growth from 93-2001, recession from 2001-03, and growth since. Krugman would argue that Reagan deserves no credit for the economy during his presidency (or since), but Clinton deserves all the credit for the 1990s economy, Bush & Bush should be blamed and shamed, but Carter should not. Sense a pattern?


Anonymous said...

Reagan's deficit spending ($3 trillion plus)now contributes to the inflation (2008)in the U.S.

Anonymous said...

Why is it "Reagan's deficit spending"?

CONGRESS sets tax and spending levels, NOT the president. The MOST a president can do is to INFLUENCE Congressional decisions with the threat to veto - which is a watered-down threat when Congress ROUTINELY sets up spending bills with a ton of non-related items in them.

Give the President an EXPLICIT "Line Item" veto, and you'd see a LOT of pork spending evaporate.

Nathan Benefield said...

Reagan's the Wrong Scapegoat for Market Crisis read more here